<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Ironman on Lavelo Triathlon Training</title>
    <link>https://blog.lavelo.es/tags/ironman/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Ironman on Lavelo Triathlon Training</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.151.2</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://blog.lavelo.es/tags/ironman/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>70.3 vs Full Ironman: Which Distance Should You Target First?</title>
      <link>https://blog.lavelo.es/posts/70-3-vs-full-ironman/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.lavelo.es/posts/70-3-vs-full-ironman/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;You&amp;rsquo;ve completed a few Olympic distance triathlons. You&amp;rsquo;re hooked. Now you&amp;rsquo;re eyeing the bigger distances, and the question looms: should you jump straight to a full Ironman, or build up through 70.3 first?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It&amp;rsquo;s a decision that will shape the next 6-12 months of your training and racing, so let&amp;rsquo;s break down what you need to know.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id=&#34;the-case-for-starting-with-703&#34;&gt;The Case for Starting with 70.3&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Training Volume Is Manageable&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A 70.3 requires roughly 8-12 hours of training per week at peak, compared to 12-18+ hours for a full Ironman. If you work full-time and have family commitments, fitting in 10 hours of training is challenging but doable. Fitting in 15-18 hours requires either significant sacrifices or an extremely understanding support system.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
